Kyuu Nye

Chek, Web design is pretty easy. If he did full html or graphical would be the question. Either way, not too surprising, because html is simple. Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

Why not? Rarity is awesome... Though my favorite pony is Twilight. After that it is a dead heat between 3 ponies... Fluttershy, Rainbow Dash and Rarity... Btw... Why did it take Twilight Sparkle so long to have her breakdown? AJ had hers pretty early, then Rarity, after her was Rainbow Dash, then Pinkie Pie and finally Fluttershy... All in the first season... It took Twilight until the second season to have hers... Speaking of which... which breakdown do you think was better... Pinky Pie or Twilight Sparkle

I love how perfectly this ending scene is timed to the Star Wars: A New Hope ending. Fans do good work...

That is EXACTLY my point. I WANT Gosho to troll the fans. I don't care about the romance in DC, I care about the mystery in DC. And sure with the way things are going with the romance Shinichi will end up with Ran, but Gosho could change whatever he wants, and that is where trolling comes in.

Fact: as this debate furthers itself, the more I want Gosho to troll the fans, and just make every theory wrong about who Shinichi will end up with.

You have GOT to stop with that. You aren't convincing anyone. My offer still stands that you scan your pay stub from whatever animation company you are supposedly working for to convince everyone here. If you cannot produce that, you don't work there and should cease lying about it, because it is insulting to those who are actually working on it. And please don't insult me by faking it, because chance are you don't know the base pay, what the pay stubs look like, or probably how to write in Japanese well enough to fake it (and I know what Japanese pay stubs look like, I have enough Japanese friends to know that much). If you really want to convince people of that RIDICULOUS story, you need to give us that much. And doing so won't infringe on your "Nondisclosure agreement" (I have signed enough of those to know how they work, and pay stubs are NEVER included, because they are necessary to prove working status for every government, and agencies that require to know employment status).

That is very interesting... Might have to obtain that... I already got S1... But really they need more music in episodes...

I now cannot decide what my favorite MLP:FiM song is... That new Pinkie Pie song is definitely a winner... But Winter Wrap Up is amazing and The Art of the Dress is also fantastic. (the latter sorta made me hate everyone except Rarity though :/)

Welcome to DCW. Hope you enjoy it here

I want to reply, but if I do, it will be so very condescending and mean, I shall refrain. And it is really in reply to those last two sentences... Really... I just cannot. I'm sorry but I am done... I cannot carry on this debate... It will make me want to kill something/someone. Hey! Maybe if I do we can prove if ghosts exist! Ghosts are supposed to appear after a violent death right?

You are kidding right? Please tell me that is a joke... You are saying scientists NEVER tested for ghosts EVER?! You obviously have never met a scientist then. We WANT to understand everything. So if there was a possibility of ghosts existing, it would have been tested to death, which it was. Which is why there are scientific reasons why people think they see and "feel" ghosts. The amount of testing on the paranormal is probably more than anything else because it is the most widely claimed thing in the world, and the one thing never proven.

Doesn't matter, because it is progressive. People tried to prove ghosts in the 19,20 and 21st centuries. Are you saying during those 300 years science is still unreliable, and that they couldn't effectively test for ghosts? @Kleene: The problem is that they do exist if they are real, they interact with the physical world. Considering that you are saying they don't exist, which is why they can't be proven... well then... They don't exist at all. Is that so hard of a concept to grasp? If they exist they interact with the physical world they can be proven. If they don't exist they don't interact with the physical world, they do not exist at all. Hence there is nothing to prove because there is nothing there in the first place.

I give up... I'll just refer you back to the DCTP thread and say again to read the debate between Jd- and Kleene... This has been done before... I would c/p Jd-'s responses to what you said, but that takes considerably more effort. Pretty much EVERY argument that you have said has been argued by Jd- in greater length and detail than I have time for. I should mention that that 30 years is what James Randi has set up and documented all comers to his challenge. You don't really believe that its only been 30 years since people have tried to prove ghosts, right? It has been more like 1000 (probably more) years, and STILL not one shred of reliable evidence.

Problem is no haunting has held up under scrutiny. Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

So a guy says he hears something that can't be captured by recording equipment (which captures sounds even humans can't hear), and a chair moves which can be easily faked on film... Sent from my Droid using Tapatalk

Proof is simple, I don't need pictures or video, those aren't trustworthy. I need measurements taken by accredited instruments that are linked unequivocally with paranormal activity. No such instrument exists. In order for ghosts to be real, and for stories to be true, there must be some energy clustered, and thus readings should be possible. If not then there is no possible way for ghosts to be seen or interact with the environment as suggested by the stories. And there cannot be any other possible explanation for it. And considering that the RELIABLE detection instruments found nothing in supposedly "haunted" areas, I cannot believe ghosts to be true. Ghosts interact and are present in some way in the physical world. They can't move something without being present, that presence should be able to be detected by science. Since it isn't all of that is BS. Science has explained why ghosts don't exist. Really, find me some concrete evidence that isn't from hokey science that can hold up to scrutiny, and I'll be a believer. While we are at it, we'll gain some money. All believers in ghosts agree on one thing, that ghosts exist as a manifestation of the human spirit (energy) in the living world that can interact and be seen. Go back to that hotel alone and see if you can replicate that spirit, she must still be there, right? Prove me wrong. I have proven to you why I believe to be right using links, scientific evidence, and you have given me anecdotal evidence that could have easily been fabricated to cover something else up, or could have been changed or exaggerated. All it takes a little fear to make people believe, and if there is a naturally occurring frequency of about 18Hz (just below the human detection limit) and the mere inclination that a ghost MIGHT exist to make someone up and leave. Frequency of Fear Again, if ghosts were real, or any other paranormal then Mr Randi would have been out a million dollars LONG ago. His standards were agreed upon by BOTH sides. In other words, every single person who took part in that challenge believed that they could prove the existence of paranormal phenomena under laboratory conditions. NOT ONE COULD IN 30+ YEARS! NONE! Hell, none even passed the preliminary phase.