User talk:Daniel46

Plot overview

It's encouraged to include a summary of the major appearances of a character in the plot, especially if they are key plot characters. The reason most character articles don't have a plot overview section right now is because no one has put in the work to write them yet. For someone like Haibara who has a lot of appearances, the summaries might not cover every appearance and are likely to brief. Unlike Wikipedia which limits the amount of detail per article, especially in "crufty" articles about characters, specialist wikis like DCWiki tend to aim for the most detail possible keeping in mind extremes. (It would be Overkill to explain what Conan did during every single case in his article for example.) If an article gets too long with plot appearances, then forking the section and making a new article out of it is the best strategy. Right now Haibara's section hasn't reached that point. Chekhov MacGuffin ^talk 16:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Maurice is the one to ask about manual of style things like when to make the call that a plot overview section has gotten too long and should be forked to a separate page. My opinion is that plot overview covers the introduction of the character and background is concerned with family relations, personal history, and things that happened prior to the current timeline. As for the Sango swimming thing, I'll fix it if you haven't already. Chekhov MacGuffin ^talk 17:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I'd also like to amend something I previously said, based on what I have seen in a few articles. Background also seems like the place for giving general info about the character and a brief summary of their plot role, like an extremely compressed plot overview.Chekhov MacGuffin ^talk 17:41, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I disagree with one thing though, just because some info is present in the background doesn't mean that it should be deleted or moved from plot overview for being repetitive. You can include how someone met in the background, but that information should also be contained with more elaboration of the circumstances and whatnot in plot overview. Chekhov MacGuffin ^talk 18:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Scar Akai vs. Shuichi Akai

Just a quick note that as far as descriptions go, the wiki is making a distinction between Scar Akai and Shuichi Akai because it's currently isn't clear if Scar Akai is actually the real Akai. Chekhov MacGuffin ^talk 21:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

OAV 05: The Target is Kogoro!! The Detective Boys' Secret Report

Dude, On OAV 05: The Target is Kogoro!! The Detective Boys' Secret Report, It doesn't say Case solved by: Kogoro Mouri! It only says Case solved by: Conan Edogawa! So how are you going to change it? --S261157 21:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Well Can you go to OAV 05, go to edit, and put Kogoro Mouri in "Case Solved By" in front of "Conan Edogawa"? --S261157 21:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Good news

Hey, good news! I edited more episodes for Mouri solved Cases. You can fixe the volume number or whatever. --S261157 23:57, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't get it

Hey, on Raven Chaser, It only says case solved by Conan Edogawa, not Conan Edogawa and Kogoro Mouri! And please don't delete some of the volumes. Check out the episodes and look for Case solved By. --S261157 15:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk Page

You're not allowed to blank your Talk Page. If it is too full, you should start an archive then you blank your Talk Page. Thanx --conanshinichi 17:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC) hi]] 10:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Mistakes on naming images

The image you upload is Ai_OAV_11! It's OVA not OAV! Can you fix that?

Re: Some spell it OAV, some OVA. As they say here in Germany, "It's just as much a jacket as pants" (i.e.: It's all the same stuff).

Are you German? This wiki is English so its supposed to be OVA.

You want an English confirmation regarding this rather useless debate? Look up http://www.cjas.org/~leng/oav.htm or anywhere else on Google. In any case, for me it's just the same.
And P.S.: 1) Please don't look down on people 'cause they ain't English-born, and 2) I just happen to speak English quite fluently.

Not important character

The principal is not the important character. It's only recurring character.

Re: I think as a recurring character he does deserve an individual entry. Well, we'll have to see whether he does make any more - and more important - appearances, though.

It's still people so he doesn't deserve his individual entry.

I've reported this to S261157. The principal is not an important character. Just a recurring character.

It's correct for a non-important recurring character to have his/her own page. It's fine. We have many other characters like that. Example: Hideo Akagi, Misae Yamamura, etc... The simple fact that it's a recurring character means that he/she has had some impact on the storyline, no matter how minor that may be. I'm putting Daniel's edit back up. --Maurice ^talk 19:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)