If substitution was possible, I would have done that.
BUT
if
A=1
B=2A
C=3A as you have said...
Does it mean G=7A???
Thats practically impossible since A = 7G. You turned the equation around.
Im going on an assumption that A=7G is an equation...which it looks like.
And based on an assumption that if this is an equation,
then G is DEFINITELY something smaller than A. (There is nothing to disagree with at this point I think...)
A=1A --> basically --> A=A <--- nothing wrong with this statement.
There is no imaginary numbers involved, they are just unknown.
Then based on the assumption that G is SMALLER than A, and assuming that this is a pattern from A onwards,
THEN B would have to be SMALLER THAN A. And by YET assuming that the amount smaller is twice (since everything was under assumption in the first place)
we get A = 2B (B is smaller)
and A = 3C and so on so forth.
If that is so, then A=4D so B=2D //
THAT IS MY FIRST ASSUMPTION.
And this is my SECOND. (I guess you have viewed all of them together)
Yep you are right by saying "F=(6/7)G=(6/8)H and G=(7/8)H is correct way to put it."
if I was still at the first assumption.
Im making a TOTALLY different assumption now. Which you have pointed out. Yes. I am making a different equation Cure kun
Oh and
YES THATS WHAT IM SAYING. A = 7G. Isnt that the equation?
(But that was the first assumption.. Not applicable here.)
Im saying, if it was the first assumption, then the answer would have been 2D. BUT
Since there was no mention how the Alphabets was related (besides A=7G), so I could only have assumed their relationship.
SO, MY SECOND ASSUMPTION IS THAT,
if each alphabet IS HALF OF THE ONE BEFORE.
which means,
A=2B
B=2C
C=2D...
and so on,
THEN
F=2G
G=2H
SO --> F = 4H
and you continue the equation, it would lead you to B = 7H.
Thats TWO ASSUMPTIONS OF THE EQUATION.
...
So what I dont understand is...
HOW can A = 7G
IF
B=2A
C=3A
...
...
G=7A?! o.O
In the end, you get B = 14N?
How was that possible if
A=1
B=2
C=3???
...
Is this an equation or is this encryption?