This test is accurate.And lemme interpret what the sides mean based on my gathered knowledge and wisdom
Authoritarian: An authoritarian is someone who is more of a leader and this kind of person have strong sense of justice and is strict when it comes to rules and regulations. They also don't let their emotions run through them. (e.g. if someone did something wrong but is close his/her, no matter what, he/she will still punish that person or if someone did something wrong but did it for a reason, he'll/she'll still not let him/her pass)
Plus, they believe that moral code, in anyway they believe it is, is above anything else.
Libertarian: A social libertarian is a person who is the other way around. They let emotions run through them and believe that when leading, they should not be strict at all. They also believe that laws are suspectible to manipulations and that they shouldn't trust it all times. They also believe that rules and regulations have exceptions.
Having freedom is also their core belief.
Being a pure authoritarian is a disaster, if their core moral belief is really wrong (e.g. hitler). Being a pure libertarian is also the same, wanting too much freedom leads to bad consequences.
Now on the other way around, Being a pure authoritarian is good, if your moral ethics is right. Being a pure libertarian is also good if you know what responsibility is and you know how to handle it.
Economic Left: This person believes that cooperation is above competition.
Economic Right: This person believes that competition is above cooperation.
I dunno about this. My belief is more of cooperation since competition leads to bad things, unless, you're cooperating to do something awful.
Also my belief stems from this example:
If you have a set of bricks (let say exactly 100 bricks) to build a small model house that needs to be presented to an audience and you have two person in-charge of doing that.
Would you either let them compete and halve the 100 bricks and give each one 50 bricks and then you'll just judge who has the better model house for the presentation?
or would you let them cooperate fully in making a model house?
Well that example above applies irl... we have a very limited resources here on earth. Why not cooperate together in one branch of industry to make only one product instead of competing and making the same kind of product which has the same use? (e.g. different brands of smartphones)