Difference between revisions of "Talk:Volume 1"
From Detective Conan Wiki
(missing words) |
(→Description format. By file or by case?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Description format. By file or by case? == | == Description format. By file or by case? == | ||
Recently [[User:CoolKid94]] redid [http://www.detectiveconanworld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Volume_1&diff=41384&oldid=41063 the first Manga Volume page that so that it the case description is on a per case basis] instead of a [http://www.detectiveconanworld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Volume_1&oldid=41063 per manga chapter basis]. I'm not sure if that is a useful improvement because it makes it less clear what files correspond to the described plot (less specificity) and the method runs into trouble when a case spans multiple volumes causing a description split (harder to keep coherent plot). I liked having descriptions for every file instead of every case better. Just to be clear, I don't mind the spoiler tag usage for resolutions and gadgets introduced and such. What do you all think? [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#B22222">Chekhov</font> <font color="#2F4F4F">MacGuffin</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#696969">talk</font>''']]</sup> 01:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | Recently [[User:CoolKid94]] redid [http://www.detectiveconanworld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Volume_1&diff=41384&oldid=41063 the first Manga Volume page that so that it the case description is on a per case basis] instead of a [http://www.detectiveconanworld.com/wiki/index.php?title=Volume_1&oldid=41063 per manga chapter basis]. I'm not sure if that is a useful improvement because it makes it less clear what files correspond to the described plot (less specificity) and the method runs into trouble when a case spans multiple volumes causing a description split (harder to keep coherent plot). I liked having descriptions for every file instead of every case better. Just to be clear, I don't mind the spoiler tag usage for resolutions and gadgets introduced and such. What do you all think? [[User:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#B22222">Chekhov</font> <font color="#2F4F4F">MacGuffin</font>''']] <sup>[[User talk:Chekhov MacGuffin|'''<font color="#696969">talk</font>''']]</sup> 01:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I also think it's better to have the description according to manga chapters instead of cases as it provides more precise information in regards to where in the manga story frame, a given situation occurs: it allows the reader to pinpoint the exact File where the related description is to be found. Again, the purpose of this wiki is to convey every bit of DC information possible in the most convenient, practical and precise way while remaining clear and very accessible on the reader-friendly side. I believe the old version of Volume 1 is more appropriate and precise in this regard. --[[User:Maurice|<span style="color:#2B4396">Maurice</span>]]<sup> <em>[[User talk:Maurice|<span style="color:#F05E24">talk</span>]]</em></sup> 15:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:12, 25 August 2011
Description format. By file or by case?
Recently User:CoolKid94 redid the first Manga Volume page that so that it the case description is on a per case basis instead of a per manga chapter basis. I'm not sure if that is a useful improvement because it makes it less clear what files correspond to the described plot (less specificity) and the method runs into trouble when a case spans multiple volumes causing a description split (harder to keep coherent plot). I liked having descriptions for every file instead of every case better. Just to be clear, I don't mind the spoiler tag usage for resolutions and gadgets introduced and such. What do you all think? Chekhov MacGuffin talk 01:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I also think it's better to have the description according to manga chapters instead of cases as it provides more precise information in regards to where in the manga story frame, a given situation occurs: it allows the reader to pinpoint the exact File where the related description is to be found. Again, the purpose of this wiki is to convey every bit of DC information possible in the most convenient, practical and precise way while remaining clear and very accessible on the reader-friendly side. I believe the old version of Volume 1 is more appropriate and precise in this regard. --Maurice talk 15:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
