Kaitou Kid Legendary Thief Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 The same is if men didn't exist, you know. The formula works both ways. Mother Mary was a virgin
Misaki-chan Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 @Kid-chan, thank you. *bows* @ Moho, I know, I know. But females are the one who actually give birth. Males just provide genetic information.
tengaku squared Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 @ Moho, I know, I know. But females are the one who actually give birth. Males just provide genetic information. True, but the roles of men and women are equal. Therefore, if one part of the equation is missing the other half will collapse.
Kaitou Kid Legendary Thief Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 True, but the roles of men and women are equal. Therefore, if one part of the equation is missing the other half will collapse. Hmm... But women are more important in the aspects of child birth. Since men require a womb for the child to grow. Unless science is advance enough to grow children out of test tubs and containers...
tengaku squared Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 Unless science is advance enough to grow children out of test tubs and containers... That would not happen, because eventually we will evolve and merge with the technology we have to be true perfect beings.
Kaitou Kid Legendary Thief Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 That would not happen, because eventually we will evolve and merge with the technology we have to be true perfect beings. Before that the world will have a heated debate about human rights topic...
tengaku squared Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 Before that the world will have a heated debate about human rights topic... And why?
Kaitou Kid Legendary Thief Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 And why? When there was cloning, they debated about human rights. When there was developing internal organs using umblical cord cells, they debated about human rights. When thy wanted to biologically engineer babies, there was debate about human rights... So when there's anything to do with biological engineering, there will be debate about human rights. I guess?
tengaku squared Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 When there was cloning, they debated about human rights. When there was developing internal organs using umblical cord cells, they debated about human rights. When thy wanted to biologically engineer babies, there was debate about human rights... So when there's anything to do with biological engineering, there will be debate about human rights. But this will occur. Humans will merge with machines to become perfect beings. First in hospitals (heck it's more or less happening right now), then the battlefield, and then the townsfolk.
Misaki-chan Posted July 13, 2011 Report Posted July 13, 2011 Can we switch the topic? I'm not in the mood for a debate.
IdentityUnknown Posted July 13, 2011 Author Report Posted July 13, 2011 ...What in the WORLD are you guys talking about?
tengaku squared Posted July 14, 2011 Report Posted July 14, 2011 ...What in the WORLD are you guys talking about? The Singularity. How's your day going?
IdentityUnknown Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 The Singularity. How's your day going? Not too shabby. A bit too warm around here...I read the Hunger Games. My dormmates think I'm a freak because I read about 50 times faster than they do.
tengaku squared Posted July 14, 2011 Report Posted July 14, 2011 My dormmates think I'm a freak because I read about 50 times faster than they do. Heck, I read about 200 times faster then my peers. And some of them don't even read.
IdentityUnknown Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 Heck, I read about 200 times faster then my peers. And some of them don't even read. *rolls eyes* Of course you read about 200 times faster than your peers who don't read.
tengaku squared Posted July 14, 2011 Report Posted July 14, 2011 *rolls eyes* Of course you read about 200 times faster than your peers who don't read. I can read one of the Hunger Games books in a 7-minute sitting. Granted I don't like the series in general so I try to get through them as fast as I can, but still...
IdentityUnknown Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 I can read one of the Hunger Games books in a 7-minute sitting. Granted I don't like the series in general so I try to get through them as fast as I can, but still... Does your method of reading involve fanning the book?
tengaku squared Posted July 14, 2011 Report Posted July 14, 2011 Does your method of reading involve fanning the book? No. Me just fast reader.
IdentityUnknown Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 메롱~ (In the distance) JULIA! GET OVER HERE AND HELP ME TRANSLATE!
IdentityUnknown Posted July 14, 2011 Author Report Posted July 14, 2011 *sighs* Google translate will do. I have to go, Bye.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now