You're right!Oh not that!
I meant the people who write the books! science usually ignores grammar rulings. And shouldn't it be "has" instead of "have"? This is confusing
And Science books usually ignore grammar but it's not true necessarily true.
Posted 12 February 2012 - 07:45 AM
You're right!Oh not that!
I meant the people who write the books! science usually ignores grammar rulings. And shouldn't it be "has" instead of "have"? This is confusing
Posted 14 February 2012 - 08:15 AM
Posted 17 March 2012 - 05:50 PM
I have a question.
My professor said that the sentence "That was her on the phone a while ago" is grammatically wrong and that "her" should be replaced with "she" which is in the nominative case. Well, never in my life have I read or heard such a sentence as "That was she on the phone." Why is that so?
Actually I don't believe the above is a run-on sentence. Here is my example:
John loves rebecca he is madly in love.
It's missing the proper punctuation. There are two different ideas incorrectly combined.
The correct way to write this would be:
John loves Rebecca. He is madly in love.
It's usually best to break the sentences down into two simpler sentences. Sure it's really simple and basic, but it's also the proper way to do it.
Posted 27 June 2012 - 09:43 AM
Posted 13 August 2012 - 03:13 AM
^When writing a paragraph, you must have at least three lines/sentences in the paragraph, but you can have up to about six/seven. You should leave 1/2 lines/sentences space inbeetween each paragraph. Or you can do this: // \\ at the beginning if you forget to leave a gap, as far as I know. Make any sense?

Tu ne mujh ko banaya
mein to gad ko na bhaya
Tu ne galay se lagaya
Haq to hi hai Khudaya,
Such tu hi hai Khudaya,
Posted 06 December 2012 - 11:14 AM
If I save you then you will be saved but if I don't save you you will not be saved but the world will still go on therefore saving you is not significant however due to the fact I can't read people's minds or predict what they will do unless I have some clue or psychic powers hence regardless of whether I save you or not I don't know if the next person will be kind enough as such but if by some action of mine you survive no matter how severe the injuries you will still be alive therefore I will have saved you. If fate predicts everything then fate can also predict the changes that will be made in it but they won't be changes as they will have been predicted. But it seems you will be far from saved by the time I finished writing this. Since it is apparently up to me I save you. Though this you can be anyone as I have not specified and/or can be negating the fact I have to save the person above me.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users